<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>The Oaktree Foundation &#187; Media</title> <atom:link href="http://theoaktree.org/blog/category/the-latest/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://theoaktree.org</link> <description>Young People Working Together To End Global Poverty</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:09:09 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <item><title>The Act To End Poverty</title><link>http://theoaktree.org/blog/2010/06/24/the-act-to-end-poverty/</link> <comments>http://theoaktree.org/blog/2010/06/24/the-act-to-end-poverty/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:32:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>comms</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[video]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theoaktree.org/?p=781</guid> <description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t already signed the Act To End Poverty Petition maybe this will change your mind. [pro-player width='530' height='253' type='video']http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PunFJIJrMx4[/pro-player]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t already signed the Act To End Poverty Petition maybe this will change your mind.</p><p>[pro-player width='530' height='253' type='video']http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PunFJIJrMx4[/pro-player]</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://theoaktree.org/blog/2010/06/24/the-act-to-end-poverty/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Aid effectiveness concerns hit the mark. So what now?</title><link>http://theoaktree.org/blog/2010/05/25/aid-effectiveness-concerns-hit-the-mark-so-what-now/</link> <comments>http://theoaktree.org/blog/2010/05/25/aid-effectiveness-concerns-hit-the-mark-so-what-now/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>comms</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Latest]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theoaktree.org/?p=191</guid> <description><![CDATA[In a week of controversy surrounding Australia&#8217;s aid contribution, Oaktree CEO Tom O&#8217;Connor writes: Commentators such as Steve Lewis have finally hit the mark when it comes to foreign aid. Going beyond the sensationalism and drama of aid consultants who are paid more than the Prime Minister, he argues “We should pause and consider a [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In a week of controversy surrounding Australia&#8217;s aid contribution, Oaktree CEO <a
href="http://www.bigmouthspeakers.com.au/uds-portfolio/speakers/">Tom O&#8217;Connor</a> writes:</em></p><div
id="attachment_192" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 242px"><a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dvids/2900999655/"><img
class="size-full wp-image-192 " title="USS Kearsarge Personnel Conduct Medical Assessment in Haiti" src="http://theoaktree.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/haiti.jpg" alt="" width="232" height="350" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">USS Kearsarge Personnel Conduct Medical Assessment in Haiti | Photo by Flickr user DVIDSHUB</p></div><p>Commentators such as <a
href="http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/yoursay/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/value_for_money_on_poverty_the_debacle_of_foreign_aid/" target="_blank">Steve Lewis</a> have finally hit the mark when it comes to foreign aid. Going beyond the sensationalism and drama of aid consultants who are paid more than the Prime Minister, he argues “We should pause and consider a new Foreign Aid blueprint”.</p><p>He raises crucial questions Australians need to be asking their government: has Australian aid reached those most in need? Has it helped to save lives? Will it make a difference in the longer term?</p><p>In short, how do we make Australian aid the most effective in the world?</p><p><span
id="more-191"></span></p><p>These questions are brought clearly into focus when considering the bipartisan commitment to increasing foreign aid to a 9 billion budget by 2015. This commitment is by no means new. Kevin Rudd announced the commitment in Opposition in 2007, and was matched by both Malcolm Turnbull and recently Tony Abbott. Thus far, however, the increase has not been linked to comprehensive review of AusAID’s capacity to deliver the money.</p><p>It has become increasingly clear that such a review needs to be a priority. An internal audit conducted in December last year found that “AusAID faces considerable management challenges amidst ongoing program growth”. Furthermore, commentators this week have rightly highlighted problems with the transparency and accountability in the way in which AusAID allocates contracts for its programs. Unaddressed, these weakness will be exacerbated by aid increases over the coming years.</p><p>Amidst all this doom and gloom, there is a danger that we lose sight of the unique opportunity we have to create an effective aid program. It is sometimes convenient to forget that when aid is delivered effectively it saves lives.</p><p>Globally, extreme poverty has been cut in half over the last 20 years. In 1990, 42% of the world’s population lived in extreme poverty; today, that’s down to around 21%. In terms of maternal health, a recent study showed that the number of women dying from pregnancy-related caused has dropped by more than 35% in the past 30 years. This dropped from more than half a million deaths annually in 1980 to 343,000 deaths annually in 2008. And due to simple immunisations that have been delivered on larger and larger scales over the past decade, we are saving 12,000 children every day from premature death.</p><p>Closer to home, Australian’s own aid effort, administered and delivered by AusAID, has eradicated polio in the Pacific region. As Australians, we should be proud of our record, whilst recognising a strong impetus for continued improvement.</p><p>The question is, so what next? If we are to have a real debate about the effectiveness of Australian aid, which reforms are going to make the biggest difference?</p><p>The debate thus far has shown that it is easy to misdiagnose symptoms as root causes.  Highly paid technical consultants and scholarships to buy support for a UN Security Council seat will make headlines, but they are simply examples of a broader malaise.</p><p>There are actually two root problems that need to be solved to make Australian aid effective: a chronic lack of political oversight and lack of transparency.</p><p>The truth is that Australia lacks the basic foundation stone of a modern, effective aid program: a Minister for International Aid and Development, and a proper Department for International Aid and Development. We need to recognise that aid and development is more than just a small cog in the machinery of foreign policy: it is an integral component of our international engagement. These reforms would ensure that the aid program is given the level of priority, and thus the public scrutiny and accountability, which it needs to succeed.</p><p>We must continue to make AusAID more open and transparent. The newly-established Office of Development Effectiveness (ODE), only the second of its kind in the world, is a good first step. The fledging ODE must be protected and nurtured by both sides of politics to ensure that it grows into a strong institution that survives the vicissitudes of three-year election cycles. Further steps toward transparency must be taken, however. Consistent experience by journalists and NGOs has proved AusAID to be extremely opaque and averse to releasing information about its projects and programs.</p><p>More than anything else, the call for increased effectiveness in the way the government spends its foreign aid represents an opportunity. Heading into a Federal Election, this is an opportunity for both major parties to show leadership on aid effectiveness and take the right steps to make Australian aid the most effective in the world.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://theoaktree.org/blog/2010/05/25/aid-effectiveness-concerns-hit-the-mark-so-what-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Ending poverty does come at a price: 70 cents</title><link>http://theoaktree.org/blog/2010/05/21/ending-poverty-does-come-at-a-price-70-cents/</link> <comments>http://theoaktree.org/blog/2010/05/21/ending-poverty-does-come-at-a-price-70-cents/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 10:31:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Media]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://theoaktree.org/?p=114</guid> <description><![CDATA[Oaktree&#8217;s General Manager Nick Allardice wrote this article in The Punch today: Australians’ obsession with interest rates and house prices is not the only symptom of an ‘affluence anxiety’ afflicting the nation. We have also cut ourselves off from the reality of life for every second child on the planet who lives in poverty and [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
id="attachment_121" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a
href="http://theoaktree.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-21-at-8.41.39-PM.jpg"><img
class="size-medium wp-image-121" title="The Punch" src="http://theoaktree.org/files/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-21-at-8.41.39-PM-300x54.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="54" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">Punch On</p></div><p>Oaktree&#8217;s General Manager Nick Allardice wrote <a
href="http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/ending-poverty-does-come-at-a-price-70-cents/">this article in The Punch</a> today:</p><p>Australians’ obsession with interest rates and house prices is not the only symptom of an ‘affluence anxiety’ afflicting the nation. We have also cut ourselves off from the reality of life for every second child on the planet who lives in poverty and for the 80 per cent of people across the world who exist on less than $10 per day. The statistics of global poverty are staggering but before you think you’ve heard this all before and switch back to worrying about your own backyard, it is important to know that progress has been made. Lives have been saved and people have been lifted out of poverty.<br
/> <span
id="more-114"></span></p><p>What we can’t afford and neither can the children still living in poverty is to drop the ball now. While you are digging around in your bag for $3.50 for a coffee, could you also spare 70 cents to prevent a mother in Africa dying from childbirth?</p><p>Here’s the evidence of what can be achieved with your 70 cents. For the first time in decades, researchers are reporting a significant drop worldwide in the number of women dying each year from complications during pregnancy and childbirth between 1980 and 2008. Maternal deaths declined to about 342,900 in 2008 from 526,300 in 1980 &#8211; a fall of about 35 per cent. “The overall message, for the first time in a generation, is one of persistent and welcome progress”, Dr Richard Horton wrote in the respected medical journal The Lancet only 2 weeks ago.</p><p>This welcome news is part of a broader picture of progress. All over the world lives are improving, diseases are being eradicated, and communities are breaking free of extreme poverty. 20 years ago, 42 per cent of the world was living in extreme poverty (defined by the World Bank as those living on less than $1.25 a day). Today that’s down to around 21 per cent. Stop for a moment to consider the significance of that progress – and also the fact that you undoubtedly didn’t know about this achievement.</p><p>It is unsurprising that we switch off from crisis and tragedy – we hear about failure and seemingly insurmountable problems almost every day. We hear about natural disasters like Haiti. We hear about the spread of HIV throughout Africa. We hear about corruption. We hear about failed or expensive aid projects. We hear about thousands of children under the age of five dying unnecessarily every day. These issues are real. We focus on them because they’re urgent and they need attention. But when they are the only things we hear about, it creates the false impression that nothing ever changes. It makes it seem like success isn’t possible.</p><p>Earlier this month the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) revealed Australia’s aid spending is well behind other developed countries. In 2009, Australia spent 29 cents out of every $100 of our national income on foreign aid, compared to an average by other wealthy countries of 48 cents. Even with a planned increase to 50 cents out of every $100 of national income, Parliamentary Secretary for International Development Bob McMullan has acknowledged Australia’s aid spend is still extremely low.</p><p>With no visible stories of success this is unsurprising. The Government and Opposition will not rush to do Australia’s fair share of foreign aid – 70 cents in every $100 – while there is a perception that there is never any progress. As the most recent maternal health figures demonstrate, progress is being made. What’s more is that Australia is directly contributing to it. Through the work of AusAID (The Australian Governments Development Agency), polio has been eradicated in the Pacific. There are undoubted challenges and we have a long way to go, but extreme poverty can be ended. The evidence of success is there for us all to see and be encouraged by. To build on success, Australia must increase its efforts and this means our political leaders committing 70 cents out of every $100 of our national income to foreign aid.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://theoaktree.org/blog/2010/05/21/ending-poverty-does-come-at-a-price-70-cents/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
